Fundamentals of Auditing: Objectives, Advantages & Types of Audit (Statutory, Internal, Cost & CAG)

85,269 views

UPSC EPFO APFC • EPFO EO/AO • SEBI Grade A • PFRDA Grade A
⚡ Quick Answer & AI Exam Snapshot (TL;DR)

Auditing is the independent, systematic examination of financial information of any entity—whether profit-oriented or not, and irrespective of its size or legal form—when such an examination is conducted with a view to expressing an opinion thereon (SA 200, ICAI). Under SA 200, the primary objective of an audit is to obtain reasonable (not absolute) assurance that financial statements are free from material misstatement whether due to fraud or error, whereas detection and prevention of fraud/error is an incidental (secondary) objective.

1. Meaning, Etymology & Authoritative Definitions of Auditing

The word Audit is derived from the Latin word “Audire”, which means “to hear”. In ancient times, whenever station stewards or estate accounts were suspected of fraud, owners appointed independent listeners before whom the accounts were read out aloud. In modern corporate governance and public finance, auditing has evolved from mechanical arithmetic verification into a risk-based assurance discipline governed by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and the Companies Act, 2013.

  • ICAI Definition (SA 200): “An audit is an independent examination of financial information of any entity, whether profit-oriented or not, and irrespective of its size or legal form, when such an examination is conducted with a view to expressing an opinion thereon.”
  • Lawrence R. Dicksee: “An audit is an examination of accounting records undertaken with a view to establishing whether they correctly and completely reflect the transactions to which they purport to relate.”
  • Spicer and Pegler: “An audit may be said to be such an examination of the books, accounts and vouchers of a business, as will enable the auditor to satisfy himself that the Balance Sheet is properly drawn up, so as to give a true and fair view of the state of the affairs of the business, and whether the Profit and Loss Account gives a true and fair view of the profit or loss for the financial period.”
  • Golden Rule for UPSC EPFO: “Accounting is a necessity, while Auditing is a luxury (for proprietorships) but a statutory compulsion for companies.” Where accountancy ends, auditing begins.

2. Book-Keeping vs Accountancy vs Auditing vs Investigation

UPSC frequently tests the boundary between routine accounting, independent auditing, and special-purpose forensic investigation. Examine the exact differences below:

Basis of Distinction Accountancy Auditing Investigation
Core Purpose Recording, classifying, and summarizing financial transactions to prepare final accounts. Critical examination of prepared financial statements to express an opinion on their “true and fair view”. In-depth inquiry into specific facts (e.g., suspected embezzlement, business valuation, loan appraisal).
Statutory Status Mandatory for companies under Section 128 of the Companies Act, 2013. Mandatory for all registered companies under Section 139–148 of the Companies Act, 2013. Voluntary or ordered by Central Government/NCLT under Sections 210–213 (SFIO under Sec 212).
Level of Assurance Not an assurance engagement; it is a compilation process by management. Provides Reasonable Assurance (high, but not absolute) based on test-checking. Seeks Substantive / Conclusive Evidence regarding a specific allegation or transaction trail.
Time Horizon Continuous, day-to-day recording throughout the financial year (1 April – 31 March). Usually annual (periodic) or continuous across a single financial year. May span multiple past years (3 to 10+ years) depending on the scope of fraud or valuation.
Qualification No statutory qualification required (performed by company accountants/CFO). Must be a practicing Chartered Accountant (CA) holding a Certificate of Practice (Sec 141). Can be performed by CAs, Forensic Auditors, Cost Accountants, or Government Inspectors.

3. Primary vs Secondary (Incidental) Objectives of Auditing

Under SA 200 (Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor) and Section 143(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, objectives are strictly bifurcated into two tiers:

A. Primary Objective: Expression of Independent Opinion (“True and Fair View”)

The sole primary objective of an audit is to enable the auditor to express an independent professional opinion on whether the Financial Statements (Balance Sheet, Profit & Loss Account, Cash Flow Statement, Statement of Changes in Equity, and Explanatory Notes) give a True and Fair View of the state of affairs and operating results in conformity with Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS / AS) under Section 133.

B. Secondary (Incidental) Objectives: Detection and Prevention of Fraud & Errors

According to SA 240 (The Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements), primary responsibility for the prevention and detection of fraud rests with both Those Charged With Governance (TCWG) and Management. In the landmark judgment In Re: Kingston Cotton Mill Co. (1896), Justice Lopes held: “An auditor is a watchdog, not a bloodhound.” However, in Fomento (Sterling Area) Ltd. v. Selsdon Fountain Pen Co. Ltd. (1958), Lord Denning clarified that an auditor must approach his work with an inquiring mind (professional skepticism), not mere mechanical ticking.

Category of Error / Fraud Technical Meaning Effect on Trial Balance Agreement Classic Exam Illustration
1. Error of Omission A transaction is completely or partially omitted from the books of original entry or ledger. Complete Omission: Trial Balance agrees.
Partial Omission: Trial Balance disagrees.
Credit sale of ₹45,000 to Mohan completely omitted from Sales Book (TB still agrees).
2. Error of Commission Wrong casting (totalling), wrong carry-forward, posting wrong amount, or posting to the wrong side of an account. Usually causes Trial Balance to disagree (unless posted to wrong personal account on correct side). Debiting Sohan’s A/c with ₹5,400 instead of ₹4,500, or debiting Sohan instead of Rohan.
3. Error of Principle Violation of fundamental accounting principles—specifically confusing Capital Expenditure with Revenue Expenditure. Trial Balance ALWAYS AGREES (Hardest error to detect without routine vouching). Wages paid for installation of new machinery debited to Wages A/c instead of Machinery A/c.
4. Compensating Error Two or more independent errors commit equal and opposite effects on debit and credit totals. Trial Balance AGREES despite multiple underlying errors. Purchases Book undercast by ₹1,000 and Sales Return Book overcast by ₹1,000.
5. Teeming & Lading (Lapping) Method of misappropriation of cash where cash received from Customer A is pocketed, and later covered up using cash received from Customer B. Trial Balance agrees; detected by matching receipt dates with bank pay-in slips and debtor confirmations. Cashierwithholds ₹20,000 received on 5th May and credits the account on 12th May when another customer pays.
6. Window Dressing Deliberate manipulation of accounts by top management to show a stronger financial position than actually exists. Trial Balance agrees. Recording next year’s sales in March, overvaluing closing stock, or omitting accrued liabilities.
7. Secret Reserves Deliberate manipulation by management to show a weaker financial position / lower profit than actual. Trial Balance agrees. Charging capital expenditure to revenue, excessive depreciation, or undervaluing closing inventory.

4. Comprehensive Classification of Audits (Statutory, Internal, Cost, Secretarial & CAG)

In UPSC EPFO APFC, EO/AO, and SEBI Grade A Paper-2, 2 to 3 questions directly ask for the statutory sections governing specific audits under the Companies Act, 2013:

Type of Audit Governing Section / Provision Who Can Be Appointed Appointing & Reporting Authority
1. Statutory Financial Audit Sections 139 to 147, Companies Act 2013 Practicing Chartered Accountant (CA) or Firm/LLP of CAs. Appointed by Shareholders at AGM; reports to Members (Shareholders).
2. Internal Audit Section 138, Companies Act 2013 (Rule 13 of Companies Accounts Rules) CA, Cost Accountant (CMA), or any other professional decided by the Board (can be an employee!). Appointed by Board of Directors; reports to Board / Audit Committee.
3. Cost Audit Section 148, Companies Act 2013 (Form CRA-1 to CRA-4) Practicing Cost Accountant (CMA) in practice (Statutory auditor CANNOT be Cost Auditor). Appointed by Board of Directors; submits report in CRA-3 to Board (Board files CRA-4 with Central Govt).
4. Secretarial Audit Section 204, Companies Act 2013 (Form MR-3) Practicing Company Secretary (CS) in practice. Mandatory for all Listed Companies + Public Cos with Paid-up Capital ≥ ₹50 Cr or Turnover ≥ ₹250 Cr.
5. Government / CAG Audit Articles 148–151 of Constitution + Sections 139(5) & 139(7) & Sec 143(5)-(7) C&AG of India appoints a CA firm for Govt Companies; C&AG conducts supplementary/test audit. Auditor appointed within 180 days of FY start (Sec 139(5)); CAG comments placed before Parliament/State Legislature.
6. Tax Audit Section 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Practicing Chartered Accountant (Form 3CA/3CB and 3CD). Mandatory when business turnover > ₹1 Crore (or ₹10 Crore if ≥95% transactions are digital) or profession receipts > ₹50 Lakh.

Mandatory Applicability Thresholds for Internal Audit (Section 138):

  • Every Listed Company (irrespective of capital or turnover).
  • Unlisted Public Companies meeting ANY of the following during the preceding financial year:
    • Paid-up Share Capital of ₹50 Crore or more; OR
    • Turnover of ₹200 Crore or more; OR
    • Outstanding Loans or Borrowings from banks/PFIs exceeding ₹100 Crore or more at any point of time; OR
    • Outstanding Deposits of ₹25 Crore or more at any point of time.
  • Private Companies meeting ANY of the following during the preceding financial year:
    • Turnover of ₹200 Crore or more; OR
    • Outstanding Loans or Borrowings from banks/PFIs exceeding ₹100 Crore or more at any point of time. (Note: Paid-up capital and deposits thresholds do NOT apply to Private Companies for Section 138!).

5. Operational / Methodological Classification of Audits

  • Continuous Audit: Examination of books at regular or irregular intervals throughout the financial year. Ideal for banking companies, electricity utilities, and giant retail chains with high volume and weak internal control. Key demerit: Risk of client staff altering figures already audited (solved using secret ticks and ink).
  • Periodical / Annual / Final / Balance Sheet Audit: Conducted in a single continuous session after the close of the financial year when final accounts are ready. Economical and ideal for small/medium enterprises.
  • Interim Audit: Conducted between two annual audits for a specific interim purpose—most commonly to enable the Board of Directors to declare an Interim Dividend or for mid-year credit appraisal.
  • Propriety Audit: Instead of merely verifying vouchers and rules, the auditor examines the wisdom, faithfulness, and economy (Value for Money – 3Es: Economy, Efficiency, Effectiveness) of expenditure decisions. Under Section 143(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, every company auditor must inquire into six specific propriety matters (e.g., whether loans/advances made on security are prejudicial to company interest, or whether personal expenses have been charged to revenue).

🎯 High-Yield Exam One-Liners (Last-Minute Revision Box)

  1. The word ‘Audit’ originates from the Latin verb ‘Audire’, meaning ‘to hear’.
  2. SA 200 deals with ‘Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with Standards on Auditing’.
  3. SA 210 deals with ‘Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements’ (Audit Engagement Letter).
  4. SA 230 governs ‘Audit Documentation’ (Working Papers are the exclusive property of the Auditor: Chantrey Martin v. Martin).
  5. SA 240 deals with ‘The Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements’.
  6. An audit provides ‘Reasonable Assurance’—a high, but never absolute, level of assurance due to inherent limitations of internal controls and test checking.
  7. Errors of Principle (e.g., treating Revenue Expense as Capital Expense) NEVER affect the agreement of the Trial Balance.
  8. Teeming and Lading is a technique of misappropriating cash receipts by concealing shortages from one customer using receipts from another.
  9. Window Dressing makes the Balance Sheet look healthier than reality; Secret Reserves make it look weaker than reality.
  10. In Kingston Cotton Mill Co. (1896), it was held that an auditor is a ‘watchdog and not a bloodhound’.
  11. Section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013 mandates Internal Audit; the Internal Auditor CAN be an employee of the company.
  12. Private companies require an Internal Auditor under Sec 138 only if Turnover ≥ ₹200 Cr or Bank Borrowings > ₹100 Cr (Capital threshold does not apply).
  13. Cost Records and Cost Audit are governed by Section 148 of the Companies Act, 2013.
  14. Under Section 148(3), the Statutory Financial Auditor (appointed under Sec 139) is strictly prohibited from acting as the Cost Auditor of the same company.
  15. Cost Audit Report is submitted by the Cost Accountant in Form CRA-3 to the Board, which forwards it in Form CRA-4 to the Central Government.
  16. Secretarial Audit under Section 204 is conducted by a Practicing Company Secretary and submitted in Form MR-3.
  17. In a Government Company (≥51% central/state share), the First Auditor is appointed by the CAG within 60 days of registration under Section 139(7).
  18. Subsequent Auditor of a Government Company is appointed by the CAG within 180 days from the commencement of the financial year under Section 139(5).
  19. Propriety Audit examines the ‘wisdom, faithfulness and economy’ of expenditure rather than mere voucher compliance.
  20. Section 143(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 incorporates six mandatory Propriety Audit inquiries for all company auditors.

📝 UPSC & Regulatory Level Practice MCQs (With Detailed Solutions)

Q1. Which of the following errors will NOT affect the agreement of a Trial Balance?
  • A. Wrong casting of the Sales Day Book by ₹5,000
  • B. Posting ₹2,500 to the debit of Machinery Account instead of Repairs Account
  • C. Partial omission of a credit purchase of ₹12,000 from being posted to the creditor’s personal account
  • D. Posting an item of ₹800 twice to the debit side of Cash Account
Correct Answer: (B) — Debiting Machinery Account (an asset/capital expenditure) instead of Repairs Account (a revenue expense) is an Error of Principle. Since the debit amount equals the credit amount in the double-entry system, the Trial Balance still agrees.

Q2. Under Section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013, an unlisted public company is mandatorily required to appoint an Internal Auditor if its paid-up share capital or turnover during the preceding financial year is at least:
  • A. Paid-up capital ≥ ₹25 Crore OR Turnover ≥ ₹100 Crore
  • B. Paid-up capital ≥ ₹50 Crore OR Turnover ≥ ₹200 Crore
  • C. Paid-up capital ≥ ₹10 Crore OR Turnover ≥ ₹50 Crore
  • D. Paid-up capital ≥ ₹100 Crore OR Turnover ≥ ₹500 Crore
Correct Answer: (B) — Under Rule 13 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 read with Section 138, an unlisted public company must appoint an Internal Auditor if Paid-up Capital ≥ ₹50 Cr, Turnover ≥ ₹200 Cr, Outstanding Loans/Borrowings > ₹100 Cr, or Outstanding Deposits ≥ ₹25 Cr.

Q3. Consider the following statements regarding Cost Audit under the Companies Act, 2013:
1. It is governed by Section 148 of the Companies Act, 2013.
2. The statutory financial auditor appointed under Section 139 can also be appointed as the Cost Auditor of the company for convenience.
3. The Cost Auditor submits the Cost Audit Report to the Board of Directors in Form CRA-3.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
  • A. 1 and 2 only
  • B. 2 and 3 only
  • C. 1 and 3 only
  • D. 1, 2 and 3
Correct Answer: (C) — Statement 2 is incorrect because Proviso to Section 148(3) explicitly states that no person appointed under Section 139 as an auditor of the company shall be appointed for conducting the audit of cost records.

Q4. The fraudulent practice of ‘Teeming and Lading’ in auditing primarily relates to:
  • A. Overvaluation of closing inventory to inflate gross profit
  • B. Misappropriation of cash receipts by concealing earlier shortages with subsequent customer remittances
  • C. Creating secret reserves by charging capital expenditure to revenue
  • D. Issuing dummy purchase invoices in the name of fictitious suppliers
Correct Answer: (B) — Teeming and Lading (also called Lapping) involves pocketing cash received from Debtor A and later crediting Debtor A’s account when cash is received from Debtor B.

Q5. According to Standard on Auditing (SA) 230, Audit Working Papers are the legal property of:
  • A. The Client Company’s Board of Directors
  • B. The Audit Committee
  • C. The Statutory Auditor
  • D. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA)
Correct Answer: (C) — As established in Chantrey Martin & Co. v. Martin and codified under SA 230 (Audit Documentation), audit working papers are the sole property of the auditor. The auditor may, at his discretion, share extracts with the client, provided it does not undermine independence.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions (Exam FAQs)

Q: What is the primary objective of Auditing for UPSC EPFO APFC?

Under SA 200 and Section 143(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, the primary objective of an audit is to express an independent opinion on whether the financial statements give a ‘true and fair view’ of the financial position and operating results. Detection and prevention of fraud and error is a secondary (incidental) objective.

Q: Can an employee of a company be appointed as its Internal Auditor?

Yes. Under Section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013, an Internal Auditor can be a Chartered Accountant, a Cost Accountant, or any other professional decided by the Board, whether engaged in practice or not, and may or may not be an employee of the company.

Q: Why does an Error of Principle not affect the Trial Balance?

An Error of Principle occurs when an accounting entry violates GAAP by misclassifying an item between Capital and Revenue (such as debiting Repairs instead of Machinery). Because a debit of equal value is still recorded for the corresponding credit, the arithmetic totals of the Trial Balance remain equal.


Discover more from CrackTarget

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Discover more from CrackTarget

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading